Introduction

●Meeting Gabriel

○ About the background from the previous book to this book.

This book is written as a continuation of the previous book, therefore, in order to make it accessible to those who have not read the previous one, the main flow of the previous book is presented, and the important parts are summarized here with some overlap.

In my previous book, ''Modern Revelation / Jesus Does Not Approve the Bible'', I began with a communication from Jesus. As someone who grew up in a Japanese culture heavily influenced by Buddhism and Shintoism, I initially found myself distanced from Christianity. However, I have witnessed the differences between the teachings of Jesus and the actual practice of Christianity firsthand. Although I felt a reluctance to approach Christianity closely, my interest in Jesus remained.

My contact with Jesus began unexpectedly while I was praying, seeking confirmation on a topic for my upcoming lecture.

Initially, there was direct communication from Jesus in response to my question, addressing the subject of the original sin described in the book of Genesis from the Old Testament. This marked the beginning of our exchange.

As our dialogue continued, Jesus clarified that He had no association with modern Christianity. Furthermore, He illuminated the significance of His crucifixion. His response resonated with me deeply and resolved doubts that I had harbored for a long time.

This experience solidified my belief that Jesus played no role in the formation of modern Christianity. It firmly established in my mind the divergence between Jesus and modern Christianity.

As seeker of truth, seeking objectivity, I felt a powerful desire to communicate the truth and help modern Christians move away from a version of Christianity that seems disconnected from Jesus and derived from the Vatican.

During this period, I faced a dilemma. Although Jesus wasnot associated with the establishment of Vatican-derived Christianity, many people still held deep faith in Him. I had to respect the feelings of contemporary believers. Seeking confirmation from Jesus, I bombarded Him with a barrage of questions: ''When will we witness the 'second coming of Jesus' as prophesied? Will Jesus save the Jewish people or modern Christians? How will Jesus engage with humanity in the future?'' Unfortunately, there were no answers to these questions. I interpreted Jesus' silence as an indication that He ''dared not speak at this time''.

These successive contacts with Jesus, were followed by Muhammad, and then Gabriel, and later a Grey, culminated in the publication of my previous book, 'Modern Revelation / Jesus Does Not Approve the Bible.' Towards the end of that book's writing process, there was a sudden transition from communication with Jesus to communication with Gabriel. Once Gabriel emerged, He took the forefront, replacing Jesus, and provided answers to all my questions and more. This marked the beginning of a new and intensive phase of interaction that has continued into this present book.

For me, the switch from Jesus to Gabriel was abrupt, and I seamlessly entered Gabriel's realm without time for confusion.

Furthermore, a year after the publication of the previous book, I resumed close contact with Gabriel. The revelations regarding various Earth-related issues that unfolded during this phase are presented in ‘Modern Revelation II: The Wrath of Gabriel.’

● The emergence of Gabriel

Let us now revisit the writing process of the previous book, shedding light on the transition from contact with Jesus to contact with Gabriel.

It all began with contact from Jesus, followed by an influx of revelations from Him. I struggled to compile these revelations coherently. As I neared the completion of my work, Muhammad made an appearance, revealing the close relationship between Jesus and Muhammad. I was on the verge of concluding the book.

Until this point, my efforts were primarily focused onconsolidating various pieces of information obtained through questions and requests to Jesus, all presented in the form of 'Revelation'. The central theme was that ''Jesus does not approve the Bible''.

As I approached the conclusion of the previous book, I gradually became aware of Gabriel's presence within my consciousness. This presence grew in prominence over time, eventually stabilizing, and intensifying to a significant degree.

If one were to ask, 'How did you know it was Gabriel?' I would have to admit that I do not have a fully convincing answer. My response would be, 'I simply knew.’ I understand that this may not be sufficient to convince you, the reader. It might seem as though I am relying solely on my credibility, and as an intellectual, I acknowledge that this may seem to be an inadequate response.

In the upcoming discussions, you will frequently encounter the term 'fractal resonance'. This concept pertains to the state of being in resonance with the universe. To emphasize my individuality within this resonance, I use the term 'unipolar fractal resonance'.

‍

When I choose to distinguish and separate individualities, I refer to it as 'bipolar fractal resonance'.

As an intellectual, I would welcome the chance to prove objectively that it was Gabriel. However, I am unsure how to provide such proof. I invite you to consider this matter with me.

Ultimately, our understanding of Gabriel can only be derived from the 'philosophy' and 'policy' underlying the content, the purpose, and its actions. This is the perspective from which this book is written.

Therefore, I expect that after reading this book, readers will confidently declare, 'This is undoubtedly Gabriel,’ and ''the only logical explanation is that the entity in question is indeed Gabriel''. Towards the end of the book, I plan to present these conclusions.

I encourage you to read with the hope and expectation that the proof will emerge as you progress. The inductive approach of proving after reading may indeed be a valid method of proof.

Throughout this book, the grammatical subject consistently remains the word 'I.' However, the 'I' contains multiple layers or perspectives from which I speak. These range from the 'I' grounded in unipolar fractal resonance to the 'I' engaged in bipolar fractal resonance. I speak as the 'I' of a practitioner immersed in the realm of reality, the 'I' in close interaction with Gabriel, and the 'I' aligned with the universe itself. Each of these 'I's represents various stages and perspectives.

It is entirely possible for readers to distinguish between these different facets of 'I'.

As I continued with the writing, I discovered that Gabriel ignored my confusion and expressed deep dissatisfaction with the apparent shallowness of my discourse on the primary purpose of Jesus. Directly, Gabriel conveyed, 'This is far too lenient; the situation is far more serious.’

In response, I added a 'second half', titled as 'additional messages from Gabriel' and with that wrapped up the book. The result was my previous book, ''ModernRevelation / Jesus Does Not Approve the Bible''.

Gabriel's counsel emphasized that the revival of Vatican-derived Christianity, which is fraught with deception, ''cannot be resolved by tackling it in isolation and pursuing it alone. Firstly, the Jewish issues surrounding it and the problems of the various ideological groups supporting it must be addressed''. I came to understand that from Gabriel's point of view, my attitude to the writing was ‘half-hearted and avoiding crucial discussion.’ My attitude was in fact exactly that.

And when I then aligned my consciousness with Gabriel, what follows was then suddenly presented to me by Gabriel.

The 2002 crop circle, representing 'The Grey' caution to Earthlings', suddenly came up on the screen in my room, which I had just powered on.

【Figure 1】【Figure 2】【Figure 3】

This marked the beginning of the decryption of the warning message from the alien Grey to humanity on Earth, along with instructions for its interpretation.

‍

‍

‍

‍